Tag Archive: Twitter


Google is being targeted by lawsuits and governments around the world with potential privacy invasions, so perhaps it wasn’t the best choice of words when Google CEO Eric Schmidt told the Mobile World Congress in a keynote address a few days ago: “We can literally know everything if we want to.”

Schmidt was absolutely right in what he had to say. The amount of information available about people is mind-boggling, particularly when people use social networking sites to post information about themselves. Just consider the site Please Rob Me. It scans Twitter streams for people who say they are not at home, and then publishes that information on the site. Why does the site do it? To let people know just how dangerous it is to publicly post information about themselves that is best left private.

Google has the capability to scan not just Twitter streams, but information from all social networks, and combine that with your search history, and information about you on the Internet. So Schmidt was not guilty of overkill when he spoke to the Mobile World Conference.

I don’t think Google quite yet understands just how dangerous many people think its power to invade people’s privacy is. But eventually, prodded by governments, I think they’ll get it.

 

Wow, check that out. What do you think about this “Please Rob Me” site?

It’s true, not only can you find out a lot about a person, with social media you can know things about them in real time. The other idea that is still difficult for me to comprehend the implications of is that information on the internet never dies – it can always be pulled up.

Whether we are conscious of it or not, we are always changing the things we want people to know about us and things we don’t. The internet puts a quick stop to that because once a thought or opinion is published, it’s on the record.

This doesn’t mean we should all get scared and run away from new technologies. We should embrace them with the implications in mind.

Posted via web from Vaibhav Gupta, put simply.

Read any newspaper article about Twitter and it won’t end without touching on the topic of how many followers one has. In fact, CNN and Ashton Kutcher had a competition with the sole purpose of amassing the most number of Twitter fans. Granted every person has the desire to feel valued, popular, and liked, but does that mean we should start cutting deals to get followers?

Allow me to digress for a second. This is comparable to counting the number of friends we have on Facebook or entries in our contacts. Is the point to hit the high score or have valuable connections that you can have a give and take relationship with?

I recently had someone tweet to me, “follow me and I’ll follow you back.” I was like…what? I checked his page out because maybe he had content he thought was relevant to me, but no…this was just someone trying to get more followers, and had written a similar message to many other users. Surprisingly (or maybe not), some 50-odd people liked the idea!

Why am I shocked? Saying “follow me” makes sense because you are just promoting yourself and your feed. But offering to reciprocate as incentive is just wrong! What is the point of human interaction? To share things we value; in this case, to read a feed that means something to us. And we follow someone to satisfy exactly that need.

Accepting the deal I was offered would be gaining a material entity. I don’t care purely about my number of followers! I care about all the people who find meaning in my tweets. If people followed me (@vgupta11) and didn’t care about my content, I would be wasting my time!

My message back to this person is…write some good things, share some good links, and you’ll get followers that will stay. Won’t get ‘em by cutting deals, innit?

On that note, find me on Twitter and follow me if you like what you read. I’ll follow any feed that is valuable to me :)
Vaibhav Gupta | Sent with my BlackBerry

Posted via email from Vaibhav Gupta, put simply.

Powered by Wordpress and Motion by 85ideas.